Overall, effect sizes were small.Conclusionīiocueing seems a helpful addition to increase interoceptive awareness among forensic outpatients. On the individual level, effects favoring the intervention were only found for two participants. On group level, no significant effects were found. However, the repeated ambulatory measurements of the single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) did not indicate a clear effect favoring the addition of biocueing.
Furthermore, three-quarters of participants reported increased interoceptive awareness associated with the biocueing intervention. 25 forensic outpatients participated.ResultsA significant decrease in self-reported aggression was found between pre- and posttest. Qualitative information regarding interoceptive awareness, coping, and aggression was collected at posttest.
During all phases anger, aggressive thoughts, aggressive behavior, behavioral control, and physical tension were assessed twice a day, and heart rate was measured continuously. Biocueing was added in the intervention phase. During the 4 weeks, a single-case experimental ABA design was applied for each participant. Measures were assessed at pretest, after 4 weeks posttest, and after one-month follow-up. Quantitatively, a pretest-posttest design was applied to explore group changes in aggression, emotion regulation, and anger bodily sensations associated with the combination of biocueing intervention and ART. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effects of the Sense-IT biocueing app as an addition to aggression regulation therapy (ART) on interoceptive awareness, emotion regulation, and aggressive behavior among forensic outpatients.MethodsA combination of methods was used. New technological-based interventions may enhance treatment outcomes, for instance by facilitating out-of-session practice and providing just-in-time support. However, the overall efficacy of current treatment interventions aimed at reducing aggressive behavior is limited. Preventing and reducing violence is of high importance for both individuals and society. The validity assessment protocol proposed in this study provides a comprehensive, standardized, and feasible method for assessment of the quality of physiological data coming from new wearable (sensor) technology aimed at ambulatory research. These findings are in line with the prior literature and demonstrate the applicability of the protocol.
#Psychopy uncurable skin
The results of the protocol show that the E4 wearable is valid for heart rate, RMSSD, and SD at the parameter and event levels, and for the total amplitude of skin conductance responses at the event level when studying strong sustained stressors. This study introduces a comprehensive validity assessment protocol for physiological signals (electrodermal activity and cardiovascular activity) and investigates the validity of the E4 wearable (an example of such a new device) on the three levels proposed by the protocol: (1) the signal level, with a cross-correlation (2) the parameter level, with Bland–Altman plots and (3) the event level, with the detection of physiological changes due to external stressor levels via event difference plots.
At present, there is a lack of consensus on a standardized protocol or framework with which to test the validity of this new technology, leading to the use of various (often unfit) methods. Wearable physiological measurement devices for ambulatory research with novel sensing technology are introduced with ever increasing frequency, requiring fast, standardized, and rigorous validation of the physiological signals measured by these devices and their derived parameters.
0 kommentar(er)
